Skip to main content
Price comparison onlyNot medical adviceUsing this site means you accept our Terms & PrivacyAlways confirm with your pharmacist

City of El PasoTX-PBM-0011

Council agenda item 21.2.1, December 22, 2015: extension of Contract 2012-256R, pharmacy benefit management, Express Scripts

Pharmacy benefit manager: Express Scripts, Inc. Term January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017. Exercises the extension option on Contract 2012-256R for January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017. The underlying contract is not attached. A later 2024 award to Aetna for medical and pharmacy administration has no posted contract text.

Not scored

What the government body posted is not the executed contract, so there is no clause text to score. The catalogue note explains what the document is, what it does tell us, and how to request the full agreement. Read the note

Posted by the entity

Contract attached to a public agenda item · Contract 2012-256R · Pricing exhibits omitted from the posting

The documents

Download and read the originals

Every file behind this record, as the government body released it. Nothing is edited; redactions are theirs, not ours.

One document on file, 1 mirrored for direct download. The government body's posting page is here.

  • Agenda item 21.2.1 with extension terms

    Agenda item · 7 pages · 617 KB

    Primary

    sha256 bed16841c06c1d82899c2c2e1ccd84167f7edc7002108ac44f05d704acaacdd2

Choose View in page on any mirrored document to read it here without leaving the site.

Redactions

What is blacked out

7 pages on file. This posting is not the executed contract, so there is no clause text to inventory for redactions. Open the original above to see the posted copy exactly as released.

Catalogue note

Why this document cannot be scored

Every quotation below is taken from the posted document and cites its page. Nothing here is a score.

What this document is

This is a seven page agenda packet for the El Paso City Council meeting of December 22, 2015, item 21.2.1. It asks the council to approve "the City's first option to renew for two additional years from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017 under Proposal 2012-256R" (page 1). The packet holds the department head's summary form (pages 1 and 2), the council project form with posting language (page 3), the October 23, 2012 motion that made the original award (pages 4 and 5), and a "Seven (7) Factor Option Memo" from the purchasing department dated December 15, 2015 (pages 6 and 7). Contract 2012-256R itself is not attached.

What it does tell us

Contract 2012-256R bundled three vendors under one solicitation: Aetna Life Insurance Company as third party administrator and network provider, Deer Oaks EAP Services for the employee assistance program, and Express Scripts Inc. as pharmacy benefit manager (page 3). The original award on October 23, 2012 ran from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015 with two further two year options (page 1). For Express Scripts, the 2012 motion listed estimated annual claims and fees of $9,800,000.00, an initial term estimate of $29,400,000.00 over three years and $68,600,000.00 over seven years (page 4). The 2015 extension carried the same annual estimate, $9,800,000.00, for a two year total of $19,600,000.00 (page 3).

The background section says "Express Scripts fees did not have an increase for January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016" and credits the Express Scripts pharmacy network with savings of "$21.4M of the Average Wholesale Prices of retail pharmacy and home delivery costs" for calendar years 2013 and 2014 (page 1). Savings measured against average wholesale price is a discount claim, not a statement of what the city actually paid per prescription or what the pharmacy received. The option memo's answer to whether the option price beats the market is that three of four nearby public entities picked Aetna and the fourth picked Express Scripts (page 6), which is a statement about peers, not prices. The memo also records a vendor performance rating of "GOOD (7-8)" or better and no debarment (page 7).

Why it cannot be scored

Everything on our checklist lives in the contract: rebate pass through, spread, audit rights, formulary control, termination, data ownership. The packet shows dollar estimates and the fact that fees were flat for one year, but not the pricing exhibits, the guarantee language or a single clause of Contract 2012-256R. The 2012 award and this extension are both council actions about the agreement, not the agreement.

An El Paso resident can request under the Texas Public Information Act the executed Contract 2012-256R and the Express Scripts pharmacy benefit management agreement under it, with all exhibits, the pricing and rebate schedules, the documents exercising the 2016 through 2017 option, and any later exercise of the second option for 2018 through 2019. The city later awarded medical and pharmacy administration to Aetna in 2024, and that contract text is not posted either, so a request could cover both the old arrangement and the current one.

The council

The council, every verdict published

The full independent review from each model, the agreement grid, and the synthesis that reconciles them.

Cannot be scored as posted

This posting is catalogued and its documents are available above, but what the government body released is not the executed contract, so there is no clause text for the council to score. The note at the top of this page explains what the document is, what it does tell us, and how to request the full contract. If the executed agreement is released, five frontier models from different providers will each score every rubric item independently, and this section will publish their full reviews, the agreement grid, and the synthesis. Nothing is scored until that happens.

Members

From the community

All community posts

Findings, questions and member analysis. Not Commons council scores.

Loading community posts.

Post a finding about this contract

Ask for what was left out

We already have this document, so you do not need to request it. What is still missing is whatever the posting withheld: redacted pricing exhibits, fee schedules, rebate terms and the incorporated proposal. Generate a Texas Public Information Act letter for City of El Paso that names those pieces, send it in your own name, and log what comes back.

Request the withheld exhibits from City of El Paso

The model contract we score against is the open source PBM contract published by Mark Cuban and collaborators, version 3.5. BetterBuy Rx did not write it and is not affiliated with its authors. Read the original on LinkedIn.