Skip to research content
Public research library
TX-PBM-0051Agenda item

City of McKinney: September 2, 2025 minutes recording the 25-34RFP pharmacy benefit selection of CVS Caremark through Employers Health

City of McKinney·CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. (CVS Caremark) accessed through the Employers Health coalition

Not Council-scored

Term Start not recordedEnd not recordedPricing exhibits omitted from the postingRetrieved Sep 11, 2026

Catalogue note · not a score

Evidence scope and missing documents

McKinney: how the CVS Caremark selection was made

What this document is

The September 2, 2025 City Council work session minutes include, as Appendix A, the benefits provider selection presentation for RFP 25-34RFP (minutes). The catalogue already holds resolution file 25-3125, the award item itself; this record adds the selection record behind it.

What it does tell us

The minutes state that the RFP was conducted by HUB International on the City's behalf and that the pharmacy benefit finalists were Aetna, Cigna / Express Scripts as incumbent, Employers Health / CVS Caremark as highest scored, and Health Action Council / CVS Caremark, with 22 total vendors responding and finalist interviews in July 2025 (physical pages 3-4). The results table records the award of medical third-party administration and dental to Cigna, the pharmacy benefit to CVS / Caremark through Employer's Health, vision to CEC Vision and the employee assistance program to Neely EAP, with a three-year rate guarantee for the pharmacy benefit and a five-year guarantee for vision and the employee assistance program; the timeline shows award in September 2025, implementation from October to December 2025, open enrollment in October 2025 and go-live with new plans in January 2026 (physical page 5). The City's 2026 benefits summary independently confirms that "Prescription drug coverage is administered by CVS Caremark" for the 2026 plan year (2026 benefits summary, physical page 1).

Why it cannot be scored

A selection presentation and member-facing summary contain no contract language, pricing schedule, rebate terms or audit rights, so no score, clause finding or council verdict is assigned. The stated 22 vendor responses differ from the 24 proposals described in the council item for file 25-3125; both figures are recorded as their sources state them, and neither is reconciled here.

Evidence still needed

The executed CaremarkPCS Health agreement or coalition participation agreement, its pharmacy pricing, administrative fee and rebate exhibits, and the terms of the three-year rate guarantee. The City's award notices page did not list an award notice or contract document for 25-34RFP when it was checked on September 11, 2026 (award notices); this is an absence of a located public record, not evidence that no contract exists. No public information request has been sent.

Members

From the community

All community posts

Findings, questions and member analysis. Not Commons council scores.

Loading community posts.

Post a finding about this contract

Complete the public record

Need the executed PBM contract or missing exhibits? Request them from the agency.

Request the contract

The reference is the open source PBM contract published by Mark Cuban and collaborators, version 3.5. BetterBuy Rx did not write it and is not affiliated with or endorsed by its authors. Read the original model contract.

Source evidence

PBM Commons · by BetterBuy RxEvidence is public. Interpretation is open to review.

Commons navigation

Find a public record