City of McKinneyTX-PBM-0017
Resolution, file 25-3125: group health and welfare benefits, pharmacy benefit management with CaremarkPCS Health
Pharmacy benefit manager: CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. Council date September 2, 2025. Resolution only; no agreement text is attached. The city posted the resolution as a Word file, which we converted to PDF without changing the content.
Not scored
What the government body posted is not the executed contract, so there is no clause text to score. The catalogue note explains what the document is, what it does tell us, and how to request the full agreement. Read the note
Posted by the entity
Award memo only · Contract 25-3125 · Pricing exhibits omitted from the posting
- The government body's own posting
- The copy we host, with download and in page viewer
- Retrieved September 5, 2026.
The documents
Download and read the originals
Every file behind this record, as the government body released it. Nothing is edited; redactions are theirs, not ours.
One document on file, 1 mirrored for direct download. The government body's posting page is here.
- Primary
Resolution, file 25-3125 (converted from the posted Word file)
Agenda item · 1 page · 40 KB
Converted from .docx to PDF by BetterBuy Rx. Content unchanged.
sha256 3b3fb3dde90e0399bf7d725fe113922162162e8444058d2136ece13c7e9082c8
Choose View in page on any mirrored document to read it here without leaving the site.
Redactions
What is blacked out
1 page on file. This posting is not the executed contract, so there is no clause text to inventory for redactions. Open the original above to see the posted copy exactly as released.
Catalogue note
Why this document cannot be scored
Every quotation below is taken from the posted document and cites its page. Nothing here is a score.
What this document is
This is a one page City of McKinney resolution, filed as 25-3125 and passed September 2, 2025, authorizing the city manager to execute contracts with four benefits vendors, including "Caremark PCS Health L.L.C. of Woonsocket, RI for pharmacy benefits management" (page 1). The posted copy is a draft: the resolution number reads "2025-09-XXX (R)" and the signature blocks for the mayor, mayor pro tem, city secretary and city attorney are unsigned. The city posted it as a Word file; we converted it to PDF without changing the content. No contract is attached.
What it does tell us
The resolution bundles the city's employee benefits procurement. Cigna Health and Life Insurance of Bloomfield, Connecticut is named for medical third party administration and dental benefits, CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. for pharmacy benefits management, Community Eye Care, LLC of Charlotte, North Carolina for vision benefits, and Neely EAP, PLLC of Helotes, Texas for the employee assistance program (page 1). The council found that "the City has received a best value proposal" from each (page 1). Section 1 authorizes the city manager to execute the contracts and Section 2 makes the resolution effective on passage.
That is the whole document. It states no dollar amount, no term length, no start date, no renewal options and no solicitation number. Of the eleven documents in this group, it is the thinnest. It does confirm one useful thing: McKinney buys pharmacy benefits under a separate contract with a pharmacy benefit manager rather than through its medical carrier, which means there is a standalone agreement with CaremarkPCS Health to request, and that agreement should stand on its own rather than being buried in a medical administrative services agreement.
Why it cannot be scored
An authorization to sign is not the thing signed. The pharmacy benefits management agreement with CaremarkPCS Health, its fee schedule, rebate terms, pricing guarantees, audit and termination clauses are all absent, and the resolution gives no figure or date we could check against them. Our checklist has nothing to read. Our catalogue entry leaves the effective dates blank for the same reason.
A McKinney resident can ask the city secretary under the Texas Public Information Act for the executed pharmacy benefits management agreement with CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. authorized by resolution 25-3125 on September 2, 2025, including all exhibits, pricing and rebate schedules and performance guarantees, along with the request for proposals, CaremarkPCS's proposal, and the staff report presented with the item. The signed resolution with its final number would help too, since the posted copy is unsigned and undated beyond the meeting date.
The council
The council, every verdict published
The full independent review from each model, the agreement grid, and the synthesis that reconciles them.
Cannot be scored as posted
This posting is catalogued and its documents are available above, but what the government body released is not the executed contract, so there is no clause text for the council to score. The note at the top of this page explains what the document is, what it does tell us, and how to request the full contract. If the executed agreement is released, five frontier models from different providers will each score every rubric item independently, and this section will publish their full reviews, the agreement grid, and the synthesis. Nothing is scored until that happens.
Members
From the community
Findings, questions and member analysis. Not Commons council scores.
Loading community posts.
Ask for what was left out
We already have this document, so you do not need to request it. What is still missing is whatever the posting withheld: redacted pricing exhibits, fee schedules, rebate terms and the incorporated proposal. Generate a Texas Public Information Act letter for City of McKinney that names those pieces, send it in your own name, and log what comes back.
Request the withheld exhibits from City of McKinneyThe model contract we score against is the open source PBM contract published by Mark Cuban and collaborators, version 3.5. BetterBuy Rx did not write it and is not affiliated with its authors. Read the original on LinkedIn.