The University of Texas SystemTX-PBM-0004
UT SELECT prescription drug plan administration, Express Scripts: contract transparency report rows only
Pharmacy benefit manager: Express Scripts, Inc. Term September 1, 2019 to March 18, 2026. The UT System posts only its contract transparency report. Row BA 2023-319 covers September 1, 2019 to August 31, 2025 and row BA 2026-130, an EGWP amendment, covers March 19, 2025 to March 18, 2026. The page says an open records request must be filed for anything beyond these rows.
Not scored
What the government body posted is not the executed contract, so there is no clause text to score. The catalogue note explains what the document is, what it does tell us, and how to request the full agreement. Read the note
Obtained from another public source
Summary only · Contract BA 2023-319, BA 2026-130 · Pricing exhibits omitted from the posting
- The government body's own posting
- The copy we host, with download and in page viewer
- Retrieved September 5, 2026.
The documents
Download and read the originals
Every file behind this record, as the government body released it. Nothing is edited; redactions are theirs, not ours.
2 documents on file, 2 mirrored for direct download. The government body's posting page is here.
- Primary
UT System Administration contract transparency report, FY2023 (row BA 2023-319)
Summary report · 16 pages · 156 KB
Generated by the UT System contract summary application, which has no static link. This is the copy we downloaded.
sha256 a39b6856a81728ebe398ce12ede38bb4e60c90ecce23f4aadb008652b2b22ac1
UT System Administration contract transparency report, FY2026 (row BA 2026-130)
Summary report · 13 pages · 135 KB
Generated by the UT System contract summary application, which has no static link. This is the copy we downloaded.
sha256 d9049f58ab76da3b48662be110827ae366f949c142f4df85b51019f169978c33
Choose View in page on any mirrored document to read it here without leaving the site.
Redactions
What is blacked out
16 pages on file. This posting is not the executed contract, so there is no clause text to inventory for redactions. Open the original above to see the posted copy exactly as released.
No agreement text is posted, only summary rows.
Catalogue note
Why this document cannot be scored
Every quotation below is taken from the posted document and cites its page. Nothing here is a score.
What this document is
These are two copies of the University of Texas System Administration Contract Transparency Report, a spreadsheet the UT System controller generates listing contracts by number, vendor, total value, term, amendment flag, commodity and procurement method. The first report covers 8/23/2022 through 1/30/2025 and runs 16 pages; the second covers 8/6/2025 through 9/10/2026 and runs 13 pages (page 1 of each). Between them, two rows concern Express Scripts and the UT SELECT prescription drug plan. The rest of the pages list architects, hotels, software and other purchases that have nothing to do with pharmacy. No agreement is posted.
What it does tell us
Row BA 2023-319, dated 3/23/2023, lists "Express Scripts, Inc." with a total value of $34,585,000 and a term of "9/1/19-8/31/25" (written that way in the report), an amendment flag of Y, the commodity "Pharmacy Benefits Management" and the procurement method "Ed. Code 51.9335--Best Value" (2023 report, page 6). Row BA 2026-130, dated 10/29/2025, lists "Express Scripts Inc." with a total value of "$0," a term of "3/19/25 - 3/18/26," amendment flag Y, and the description "Amendment: adding EGWP services" (2026 report, page 9).
So the UT System has had Express Scripts as pharmacy benefit manager for UT SELECT since September 1, 2019, the arrangement carried a total value of $34,585,000 when the 2023 entry was made, and a 2025 amendment added EGWP services at no stated additional value. The citation to Education Code 51.9335 and "Best Value" tells us the procurement authority, not how bids were scored or who else bid. The controller's contract summaries page, from which these reports come, says an open records request must be filed for anything beyond these rows.
Why it cannot be scored
Two spreadsheet rows carry a vendor name, a dollar figure and a date range. They carry no clause. We do not know whether the $34,585,000 is administrative fees, an estimate of drug spend or something else, what the rebate terms are, whether UT pays pass through or spread pricing, whether it can audit, or how the 2025 EGWP amendment changed the deal. The rows show the base term ending August 31, 2025 and the EGWP amendment running to March 18, 2026, and nothing after that, so whatever governs UT SELECT pharmacy benefits today is not visible here. Our checklist grades contract language, and a summary row is the opposite of contract language: it is what is left after every term has been stripped out.
A UT System employee, retiree or Texas resident can ask the UT System under the Texas Public Information Act for the executed pharmacy benefits management agreement with Express Scripts, Inc. recorded as BA 2023-319, with all exhibits and the pricing, rebate and performance guarantee schedules, every amendment including BA 2026-130, and any successor agreement or extension for UT SELECT pharmacy benefits after August 31, 2025. The UT System's own page invites that request, so the path is already marked.
The council
The council, every verdict published
The full independent review from each model, the agreement grid, and the synthesis that reconciles them.
Cannot be scored as posted
This posting is catalogued and its documents are available above, but what the government body released is not the executed contract, so there is no clause text for the council to score. The note at the top of this page explains what the document is, what it does tell us, and how to request the full contract. If the executed agreement is released, five frontier models from different providers will each score every rubric item independently, and this section will publish their full reviews, the agreement grid, and the synthesis. Nothing is scored until that happens.
Members
From the community
Findings, questions and member analysis. Not Commons council scores.
Loading community posts.
Ask for what was left out
We already have this document, so you do not need to request it. What is still missing is whatever the posting withheld: redacted pricing exhibits, fee schedules, rebate terms and the incorporated proposal. Generate a Texas Public Information Act letter for The University of Texas System that names those pieces, send it in your own name, and log what comes back.
Request the withheld exhibits from The University of Texas SystemThe model contract we score against is the open source PBM contract published by Mark Cuban and collaborators, version 3.5. BetterBuy Rx did not write it and is not affiliated with its authors. Read the original on LinkedIn.