Inspect historical council readings (5 recorded for this criterion)
These are separately attributed readings of this record, not independent community contributions. Versions can differ; no new consensus has been calculated.
Claude Opus 5
Not addressedRubric v2 · Historical council readingNo evidence quotation was recorded for this finding.
Recorded reference: No page reference recorded
Published rationale. The pricing summary on pages 10 and 11 sets discount rates off average wholesale price but never caps what the plan pays against any external published benchmark such as a transparent cash price. There is no claim by claim test and no statement that the county will never pay more than a publicly available price. The subject does not appear in the memoranda, the consultant notes on page 17 or anywhere else in the packet.
“Not addressed” is this published review’s conclusion about the produced text, not proof that a provision is absent from every version or withheld document.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Not addressedRubric v2 · Historical council readingNo evidence quotation was recorded for this finding.
Recorded reference: No page reference recorded
Published rationale. The agenda backup does not contain the executed agreement and does not address benchmark ceilings or cheapest lawful option pricing.
“Not addressed” is this published review’s conclusion about the produced text, not proof that a provision is absent from every version or withheld document.
GPT 5.6 Sol
Not addressedRubric v2 · Historical council readingNo evidence quotation was recorded for this finding.
Recorded reference: No page reference recorded
Published rationale. The pricing tables on pages 10 and 11 use AWP discounts and dispensing fees. They do not cap each claim at a published cash benchmark or the cheapest lawful option, and no claim-level ceiling appears elsewhere in the packet. The executed agreement that might contain such a ceiling is not included.
“Not addressed” is this published review’s conclusion about the produced text, not proof that a provision is absent from every version or withheld document.
Grok 4.6
Not addressedRubric v2 · Historical council readingNo evidence quotation was recorded for this finding.
Recorded reference: No page reference recorded
Published rationale. The rate tables on pages 10 and 11 are AWP discounts and dispensing fees. There is no claim-by-claim ceiling against a published cash price or other public benchmark. Pages 1 through 18 do not mention a cheapest lawful option test.
“Not addressed” is this published review’s conclusion about the produced text, not proof that a provision is absent from every version or withheld document.
Kimi K3
Not addressedRubric v2 · Historical council readingNo evidence quotation was recorded for this finding.
Recorded reference: No page reference recorded
Published rationale. No page sets a claim-level ceiling tied to a published benchmark or cash price. The rate tables on pages 10 and 11 are AWP discount guarantees only. A benchmark ceiling is not mentioned anywhere in the 18 pages.
“Not addressed” is this published review’s conclusion about the produced text, not proof that a provision is absent from every version or withheld document.