Skip to research content
Public research library
Topic PERF

Performance guarantees with real remedies

Published findings, original references and room for an evidence-backed challenge.

What the rubric looks for

Guarantees are measured quarterly on plan-specific data, reconciled in cash, and shortfalls are paid dollar for dollar rather than as capped credits.

Why it matters

Guarantees that are capped or measured on book-of-business data rarely pay out.

PERF · Weight 2/100 · Introduced in rubric v1

Reference: Section 10

Only the selected record is loaded. Findings below are not a cross-contract tally or community activity.

Published evidence

Travis County · Envision Pharmaceutical Services, LLC

Published Commons finding

Weaker than the modelFinding rubric version not recorded
Envision included substantial performance guarantee monies for the performance and service of the plan. In addition to service guarantees, Envision is proposing a 9.5% spend reduction guarantee over the current pharmacy costs.

Recorded reference: Page 10

Open source PDF near page 10

Page navigation follows the recorded reference; check printed numbering against the PDF.

Published rationale. All five models reached this verdict. Pages 2 and 10 record substantial performance guarantee monies for service and a proposed 9.5 percent spend reduction guarantee over current pharmacy costs, and page 11 adds rebate minimums of $17.35 per Brand Rx at retail and $66.60 per Brand Rx at mail. Guarantees plainly exist, but the packet does not say how they are measured, whether they use Travis County data, whether shortfalls are paid in cash or as capped credits, or how often they are reconciled. The guarantee exhibit that would answer those questions is not part of the backup.

Inspect historical council readings (5 recorded for this criterion)

These are separately attributed readings of this record, not independent community contributions. Versions can differ; no new consensus has been calculated.

Claude Opus 5

Weaker than the modelRubric v2 · Historical council reading
Envision included substantial performance guarantee monies for the performance and service of the plan. In addition to service guarantees, Envision is proposing a 9.5% spend reduction guarantee over the current pharmacy costs.

Recorded reference: Page 2

Open source PDF near page 2

Page navigation follows the recorded reference; check printed numbering against the PDF.

Published rationale. The agenda request and the pharmacy memorandum both record service performance guarantee money and a 9.5 percent spend reduction guarantee, and page 11 adds rebate minimums per brand prescription, so guarantees clearly exist. The packet does not say how often they are measured, whether they are measured on Travis County data, whether shortfalls are paid in cash or as credits, or whether payouts are capped. Those mechanics would sit in a performance guarantee exhibit that is not part of this agenda backup.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Weaker than the modelRubric v2 · Historical council reading
Envision included substantial performance guarantee monies for the performance and service of the plan.

Recorded reference: Page 10

Open source PDF near page 10

Page navigation follows the recorded reference; check printed numbering against the PDF.

Published rationale. The agenda backup mentions substantial performance guarantee monies and a spend reduction guarantee. It earns a partial score because the full contract is not provided, making it impossible to check if guarantees are reconciled in cash without caps.

GPT 5.6 Sol

Weaker than the modelRubric v2 · Historical council reading
Envision included substantial performance guarantee monies for the performance and service of the plan. In addition to service guarantees, Envision is proposing a 9.5% spend reduction guarantee over the current pharmacy costs.

Recorded reference: Page 10

Open source PDF near page 10

Page navigation follows the recorded reference; check printed numbering against the PDF.

Published rationale. The proposal includes monetary performance guarantees and a specific spend reduction guarantee. The packet does not state quarterly plan-specific measurement, cash reconciliation, or dollar-for-dollar uncapped payment of shortfalls. The executed guarantee schedule is not included.

Grok 4.6

Weaker than the modelRubric v2 · Historical council reading
In addition to service guarantees, Envision is proposing a 9.5% spend reduction guarantee over the current pharmacy costs.

Recorded reference: Page 10

Open source PDF near page 10

Page navigation follows the recorded reference; check printed numbering against the PDF.

Published rationale. Pages 2 and 10 state that Envision included substantial performance guarantee monies and is proposing a 9.5% spend reduction guarantee over current pharmacy costs. Page 11 adds retail and mail brand rebate minimums of $17.35 and $66.60 per Brand Rx. The backup does not say guarantees are measured quarterly on plan-specific data, paid in cash, or uncapped dollar for dollar, and the guarantee exhibit is not attached.

Kimi K3

Weaker than the modelRubric v2 · Historical council reading
In addition to service guarantees, Envision is proposing a 9.5% spend reduction guarantee over the current pharmacy costs.

Recorded reference: Page 10

Open source PDF near page 10

Page navigation follows the recorded reference; check printed numbering against the PDF.

Published rationale. The backup states Envision proposed substantial performance guarantee monies, a 9.5% spend reduction guarantee, and page 11 adds rebate minimums of $17.35 per retail brand claim and $66.60 per mail brand claim. What is missing is the machinery the model requires: measurement on plan-specific data, quarterly reconciliation and dollar-for-dollar cash payment of shortfalls. Whether the guarantees pay out in cash depends on guarantee language the backup does not contain.

Document manifest and citation limits

Quotations and rationales are reproduced from published findings, not newly verified here. Named exhibits, amendments and ambiguous references must be checked in the document itself.

Community participation

Have contrary evidence, a missing exhibit or a question about the interpretation? Use the existing community composer to prepare a labelled finding. Publishing a community post is separate from a Commons review and does not change the contract score.

This research topic is not a membership channel. Following topics and private agency workspaces are not enabled here.

PBM Commons · by BetterBuy RxEvidence is public. Interpretation is open to review.

Commons navigation

Find a public record